The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a tale of contrast between good and evil.
The Monument to the Martyred Police. ON the morning of Friday, the twentieth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-six, twelve men, ranging in age from fifty-three years downward to early manhood, walked two by two from the Revere House, a hotel in the city of Chicago, to the building in which the criminal court of Cook County held its sessions.
The hotel is on the southeast corner of Clark and Michigan streets, and the court- house was it has been torn down to be replaced by a better on the north side of Michigan street, a little east of the hotel.
The men were guarded from all communication with any per- son by a bailiff of that court at each end of the short procession which their ranks composed. Greiner, Andrew Hamilton, Harry S.
Sandford, and Scott G. Neebe, indicted for the murder of Mathias J. Degan, on the fourth day of May, i, in Chicago. Upon that trial the State was represented by Julius S.
Grinnell, States Attorney, Francis W. Ingham of counsel; the accused were attended by William P. And Ike law is common sense. Twenty-one days passed away in selecting the jury; men were called to the chairs where the jury sat, and were sworn and questioned, before the dozen who tried the case were accepted.
At all times the dozen chairs were kept full, and when a man went into one of them he became a close prisoner, not to be released until he was rejected as unfit to serve on the jury; or, if he became one of the chosen twelve, not until he and his fellows gave the final verdict.
On all former occasions when the jurors were on the street, they had conversed with one an- other, had looked about them, at the people, at the buildings, at the trifling incidents of street life. On this morning each man walked in si- lence; turning his eyes neither to the right nor left, he avoided all recognition of any acquain- tance who might be in the multitude that filled the street.
The time for the court to con- vene was nearly an hour off; yet Michigan street was thronged, so that vehicles went around another way, and the people pressed upon one another to make a path for the jury.
Upon those jurors, and the case pending be- fore them, the attention of the civilized world had been fixed for weeks, and now that world awaited their verdict with painful anxiety. We who participated in the trial did not know until it was ended with what interest we were watched by all Christendom.
The jurors had no access, either by newspapers or conversation, to any source of information, being at all times either in court, in a room set apart for them in the court-house, in a suite of rooms at the hotel, or in a body taking exercise on the streets; and always, when not in court, guarded by bailiffs.
The counsel engaged in the case were ftilly occupied, when out of court, pre- paring for the work of the next session.
I read the papers very little, and declined all conver- sation upon the subject that occupied my busi HON. But we did know that the immense court-room much too large for the easy and orderly conduct of an exciting trial was constantly crowded. The room was a hundred feet long, and the width and height were proportioned to the length.
Across each end ex- tended a gallery. At the begin- ning of each session of the court I announced that no person would be Permitted to stand in the court- room, except in the way of duty; that no one could lounge on rail- ings, oron the arms of seats, but that every spectator must be down in a seat, or leave the room; and this rule was strictly enforced.
Also, that there must be no talking, whisper- in g, or laughing, and that any token of approval or censure of any of the proceedings would cause the im- mediate expulsion of the offender from the room.
I had been in- formed that upon one noted trial in that room there had been great bsOrder, and I determined to pre- vent a repetition of that disgrace.
With one considerable and one very slight ex- ception, there was no audible expression of feel- ing by any of the audience throughout the trial.
Grinnell was about to begin his closing argument to the jury, at the solicitation, without his knowledge, of many Of the bailiffs in attendance, and upon their assurances that they could prevent all disor- der, I permitted the galleries to be opened.
As soon as people began to enter them, I re- ceived a note from Mrs. Black, wife of the leading counsel for the defense,shebeingcon- stantly in attend ance, stating that many per- sons had desired to hear his speech, and had been prevented, as they could not get into the court-room, and asking if I thought it was fair to open the galleries for an audience that had been excluded when her husband spoke.
I recognized the justness of her complaint, and, calling Mr. Black to the bench, showed him the note of his wife, and offered to clear the galleries and to shut them up again, if he pre- ferred that it should be done.
He thought it not worth while, but the event showed how unwise it was to open them. During his speech Mr. Grinnell made some impassioned excla- mation I do not recall the words to the ef- fect that nobody feared anarchists, at which a storm of al plause broke out in the east gal- lery.
A futile attempt was made to discover who began it, and after some delay Mr.
Grin- nell proceeded without further interruption. The other exception, earlier, was in this wise. Doing what Lord Coleridge has since been se- verely criticize I by the English papers for do- ing in the famous Baccarat trial, I permitted the bench to be filled with spectators, mostly ladies.The Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde from Robert Louis Stevenson Essay What view of human nature does Stevenson present in the The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde Essay Representation of evil in Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and William Goldings Lord of the Flies Essay.
Free Essays How does Stevenson present good and evil in “Jekyll and Hyde”? What view of human nature does Stevenson present in the The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde ; Representation of evil in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and William Goldings Lord of the Flies ;.
themes in lord of the flies essay; filipino people and spaniards essay; the strange case of dr jekyll and mr hyde by r l stevenson essay; agricultural science 2 essay; proessionals responsibility to the society essay; goldings representation of the deaths of simon and piggy essay;.
We will write a custom essay sample on The representation of evil in Golding’s Lord of the Flies with Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde specifically for you for only $ $/page Order now. Representation of evil in Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and William Goldings Lord of the Flies.
"Sucks to you." He also addresses the atom bomb and outlines a clear allegory of Nazi Germany though the boys savage behaviour, loss of order and distinguishing them selves with face paint "He made one cheek and one eye .
1. PHILOSOPHY GOES TO THE MOVIES ‘Philosophy Goes to the Movies is very clearly and engagingly written It has a particular claim on the attention of those preparing.